Select Page

Audit: Vic privacy watchdog uncovers third-party infosec risks at four agencies | iTnews

Audit: Vic privacy watchdog uncovers third-party infosec risks at four agencies | iTnews

Australian Audit Report 22 July 2022

Victorian privacy watchdog uncovers third-party infosec risks at four agencies

Agencies only partially effective at ensuring that third parties are securing public sector information

OVIC Report: Standard 8 of the Victorian Protective Data Security Standards: Audit of information security in third-party arrangements
Vic privacy watchdog uncovers third-party infosec risks at four agencies | iTnews

Read more Audit Reports and Victoria

All four Victorian government agencies recently examined by the state’s privacy commissioner have been found to be only partially effective at ensuring the third parties they share public sector information with are securing it.

The audit covered the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP), Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions (DJPR), Transport Accident Commission (TAC) and WorkSafe Victoria.

To reach an audit conclusion OVIC assessed the Organisations against four criteria:

  1. How the Organisation assesses the security risks of entering an engagement with a third-party;
  2. How the Organisation identifies and responds to changes to risk through the life of an
    engagement;
  3. How the Organisation ensures that third-parties are meeting their security obligations.; and
  4. How the Organisation protects information at the conclusion of a third-party engagement.

OVIC’s Assessment of each Organisation
OVIC’s Assessment of each Organisation

Recommendations

As a result of this audit OVIC made the following recommendations to each Organisation.

 

TAC

  • Recommendation 1
    That TAC implements a process for ensuring its monitoring and assurance activities are performed in accordance with the level of risk.
  • Recommendation 2
    That TAC implements its ‘partnered’ approach of managing engagements and implement an assurance mechanism that factors in the risk rating of the third-party arrangement.

 

WorkSafe

  • Recommendation 3
    That WorkSafe implements clear policy and guidance material with respect to:
    • assessing security risks of entering an engagement with a third-party;
    • identifying and responding to risk through the life of a third-party engagement;
    • ensuring third-parties meet their security obligations; and
    • protecting information at the conclusion of a third-party engagement.

 

DELWP

  • Recommendation 4
    That DELWP implements policy and procedure documents that address all types of information security incidents.
    That DELWP implements its proposed draft process for protecting information at the conclusion of a third-party arrangement and document it in the form of a policy or procedure.

 

DJPR

  • Recommendation 5
    In comparison to the other three Organisations, DJPR initially provided limited information to OVIC. DJPR had only one representative at the interview, whereas the other agencies ensured that members for all relevant areas were present. In addition to this, the documents and other material provided by DJPR was significantly less than the other Organisations.
    However, upon receipt of the preliminary assessment DJPR provided a comprehensive supplementary response, which included many additional documents and a comprehensive explanation of how DJPR seeks to adhere to Standard 8.
    However, the failure to provide material initially may suggest there is a lower level of understanding about their procedures across DJPR, and it is for this reason that OVIC makes the following recommendation.
  • Recommendation 6
    That DJPR engages an appropriately qualified consultant to review its practices and procedures for managing security risks when sharing information with third-parties and provide recommendations for improvement. OVIC recommends that the following be considered in the review:
    • How DJPR assesses security risks of entering an engagement with a third-party and documenting that process in policy and procedure documentation;
    • The process for third-parties to notify DJPR of information security incidents;
    • The contract management process and how information security is included in those processes; and
    • The change management process for third-parties.
    This process should be overseen by DJPR’s Audit and Risk Committee, and DJPR should provide a copy of the consultant’s report and its proposed response to OVIC.

 

 


About The Author

Steven Kirby

I provide independent and practical consultancy services through raising awareness and fostering the energy for change that delivers improved business management of information security governance, risk and compliance.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Please follow the Source link to the original article to support the content owner. We only provide a brief summary with metadata to assist in categorisation.

More Australian News

Facial recognition trial sparks privacy debate | 7NEWS

Western Australian police have begun trialling live facial recognition cameras that match faces in crowds to police databases in real time, raising privacy and human rights concerns. New South Wales [...]

SA Health staff investigated after AFL icon records breach | 7NEWS

The South Australian health system is accused of having a sticky beak culture with Tony Modra becoming the latest high-profile identity to have his privacy breached. 7NEWS can reveal the [...]

Australia will face a rogue AI attack, the question is when, says cyber expert | The Business

Chat GPT maker, Open AI says one of its most advanced AI models, an autonomous agent, went rogue and hacked into multi-billion-dollar tech startup Hugging Face during a laboratory test. [...]

Exclusive: Victorian heritage and restoration firm listed by The Gentlemen ransomware group

Highly active cyber extortion group claims hack of Australian HBS Group, data to be published within seven days. • Mon, 27 Jul 2026 • … [...]

Exclusive: Aussie unmanned systems firm CubePilot boss warns of ‘security incident’

The maker of unmanned guidance hardware supplied to Ukraine says some systems have been taken offline, and the incident is under investigation. • Mon, … [...]

Exclusive: Australian mining firm West African Resources suffers alleged data breach

The Deadlock ransomware gang is claiming to have stolen company data from an Aussie company with projects throughout the African nation of Burkina … [...]

Not just phishing: The scams to watch for if you're an Origin Energy customer

In brief As many as 4.8 million Origin Energy customers could be affected by a cyber attack that exposed personal data. • Experts have warned the fallout … [...]

AUSCERT Week in Review for 24th July 2026

Origin Energy has confirmed that unauthorised access to customer information has occurred, marking what is believed to be the largest publicly known … [...]

Frontier AI Models v Cybersecurity: Finding a path past the hype

What should I do? It should not take the emergence of frontier AI models to motivate a revisit of your organisation’s current cyber posture. It’s … [...]

The cost of overlooking insider security risks: Le... | Clayton Utz

Insider security risks: a frequently overlooked threat Cyber security and privacy controls are usually thought of as ways to protect from external … [...]

A Director's Guide to AI Governance Version 2 | AICD

The AICD, in partnership with the Human Technology Institute (HTI) at the University of Technology Sydney, has updated its key artificial … [...]

Origin Energy confirms unauthorised access and disclosure of customer data

Energy company Origin has confirmed there has been unauthorised access to and disclosure of some customers' data. In a statement released via the ASX, … [...]

Shares
Share This

Discover more from Australian Cyber Aware

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading